Service I
Strategic diagnostic
AI Opportunity Mapping
Understand where AI can create value, before any heavy commitment.
- Format
- Strategic diagnostic
- Typical duration
- 2 to 4 weeks
- For
- Executive committee · CIO
- Engagement
- Fixed fee
OServices
Four formats - from short diagnostic to end-to-end run.
Three main engagements (Opportunity Mapping, Blueprint, Build & Run) cover the entire journey, from strategic diagnostic to continuous operations. A fourth format - the AI Sprint - offers a short, engaging entry point for organizations that want to start concretely before committing to a longer cycle.
Service II
Target architecture
Agentic Operating Blueprint
Design the target system - architecture, agents, governance, deployment plan.
- Format
- Architecture engagement
- Typical duration
- 4 to 8 weeks
- For
- CIO · CTO · Business leaders
- Engagement
- Fixed fee or framed day rate
Service III
Delivery & operations
Build & Run Partner
Build, integrate and operate the agentic system with you.
- Format
- Delivery engagement
- Typical duration
- Continuous 2-4 week sprints
- For
- Business · IT · Data teams
- Engagement
- Sprint fee or framework contract
Service IV
Entry product
AI Sprint
A short, engaging entry product - 72 hours or 1 week - to start concretely.
- Format
- Short sprint - 72h or 1 week
- For
- Decision-maker ready to act
- Engagement
- Fixed fee, upfront payment
- Sales cycle
- One meeting, fast decision
The recommended entry format is the Opportunity Mapping for organizations in strategic framing, or the AI Sprint for those who already have a scoped use case and want a fast unlock.
How to choose
Which format depending on your starting point.
Each format has a precise function in the journey. The right entry point depends on the maturity of the AI topic in your organization and the horizon in which you want to act.
MATRIX 01 - ORIENTATION
4 FORMATS
01
Starting point
You want to frame strategically before committing budgets
Format
AI Opportunity MappingOutput
Diagnostic, opportunity / risk matrix, prioritization and 90-day roadmap.
Next path
After the request: short pre-diagnostic, scope validation, then a framed proposal.
02
Starting point
You have a scoped use case and want a fast unlock
Format
AI SprintOutput
A focused deliverable for a compatible case: prototype, mini-blueprint, matrix or targeted audit.
Next path
After the request: eligibility check; payment only if the sprint is confirmed.
03
Starting point
You want to set the target architecture and governance before deploying
Output
Target architecture, agent / human / tool mapping, governance and deployment plan.
Next path
After the request: reuse of existing diagnostic work or preliminary framing if the topic is still unclear.
04
Starting point
You want to build, integrate and operate an agentic system over time
Format
Build & Run PartnerOutput
Build sprints, integrations, operational agents, dashboards, runbooks and handover.
Next path
After the request: validation of the blueprint, client/cabinet responsibilities and first sprint.
Indicative reading: the final recommendation depends on context, data, risks and execution capacity.
Pre-diagnostic
What happens before any commitment.
The first conversation is used to qualify the right entry point, not to push a default service. It distinguishes diagnostic, AI Sprint, Blueprint and Build & Run based on maturity, risk and execution capacity.
Incoming request
Business-day response, clarification of context, objectives, data/compliance constraints and decision level. No payment is triggered at this step.
AI Sprint eligibility
The AI Sprint is recommended only if the case is bounded enough, stakeholders are available and the deliverable is realistic in 72 hours or one week. Otherwise, the diagnostic or Blueprint are healthier.
Reasonable safeguards
The practice commits to a method, deliverables and a reinforced best-efforts obligation. It does not promise ROI, legal compliance or model performance without verified context.
Follow-up path
The restitution may lead to stopping, an AI Sprint, a Blueprint, Build & Run or internal handover. The follow-up remains an explicit decision, never automatic.
Framing criteria
What is checked before recommending a format.
The recommendation does not start from a service catalog. It starts from topic maturity, risks and the organization's real ability to move.
Topic maturity
Is the case still exploratory, already scoped, or ready to enter construction?
Data quality
Are sources, access rights, owners and constraints already known?
Governance risk
Does the case involve compliance, human validation, auditability or decision exposure?
Execution capacity
Does the organization have the stakeholders and decision windows required to move?
Diagnostic
Identify the right format for your organization.
A first exchange lets us quickly orient towards the most adapted service for your context - Opportunity Mapping to frame, AI Sprint to start, Blueprint to structure, Build & Run to industrialize.